Interesting logic: unfortunately, Saudi Arabia doesn’t have religious freedom, America does. It needs to act like it. |
“The intent of this ad is to communicate that the true biblical response to those of other faiths-or no faith-is respect and civility in religious discussions, disagreements and debates. Acts of hatred in the name of Christianity are antithetical to the good news of the Gospel so intrinsically expressed in the Bible.”
Who’s the enemy? Muslims aren’t the enemy: Terrorism and Evil are. |
We like to say that Jesus died for the world, but do you realize who that includes? Everyone, Buddhist, Catholic, Baptist, Atheist, New Age, Mormon, and Muslim. We like to lump all Muslims into a group of terrorists trying to overrun our country; them we de-humanize them, support dropping a nuke and wiping them all out. We forget that each one is a soul, a precious human life. We forget how God sees them, how he cares about them and loves them, each and every one of them, enough to die for them. If that’s how God sees Muslims, what right to do we have to hate them?
Mariposa says
Very thought-provoking post on a difficult and controversial subject… Blessings on your day, amiga! 🙂
Joy Brace says
Great thoughts Em! The only one I somewhat disagree with is the comment that America is not a Christian nation. I don't think the term refers to its population but rather to the principles of its inception. America is unique in the foundational concepts of our original documents and governmental structure. These clearly were derived from concepts of the Judeo Christian God and His Word. True religious freedom comes from the very concepts you were mentioning of love for others and winning them by the love of Christ not constraining them to Christianity. This first excercised in the Baptist colony of Rhode Island which later has a huge impact in the formation of the religious freedom we now take for granted. Also clearly defined is the understanding that man has intrinsic value as the creation of God, although this was imperfectly applied until after the Emancipation of slaves many years later and later civil rights movement. The erosion of these foundational concepts are a deep part of the spiritual decay now so prevalent.
Thanks for your post. You are so right about exercising anyone's religious freedom. If Muslims are restricted today, will we be restricted tomorrow? Have a great day!
Emily Joyce says
The "principles of it's inception" that you've mentioned are indeed BIBLICAL, but they really have nothing to do with CHRIST or our need for him (they are mainly derived from the 10 Commandments, long before He came to earth). Consequently, the word "Christian" doesn't seem fitting. I think we'd both agree it takes more than a belief in God to be a Christian, so it should take more than an acknowledgement of Him as Creator and Sovereign Being to make a Constitution, government, and nation "Christian."
You're right that the "erosion" of the Biblical foundations has resulted in today's spiritual decay. That "spiritual decay" is why I believe "The United States is Christian inasmuch as it looks like Christ. CHRISTIAN came to refer to those disciples who saw themselves as "little Christs," people who were literally the body of Christ, the hands and feet of Jesus alive in the world. As our brother Rob Bell says, Christian is a bad adjective, but a good noun"(Jesus For President). If its leaders don't follow Christ, and the nation as a whole doesn't exhibit repentance for sin and a desire to be Christ-like, I don't believe it can be said to be Christian.
That's a short explanation, I hope it makes sense.
Mandy says
The reason that people would not care if they were building a church only 2 blocks away from Ground Zero because the terrorists did not murder 3000 people in the name of the Christian God…they murdered them in the name of the Muslim religion.
And yes, those specific terrorists are dead, but there are many many more terrorists we are STILL AT WAR WITH. Not all Muslim are terrorist, in fact most of them are very wonderful people. But all the terrorists we are currently fighting are Muslim.
The Muslims have every right to build a mosque wherever they want to. BUt if their intentions were peaceful, wouldn't they want to move it since it is such an emotionally charged issue?
I do however agree with you 100% that the burnings of the Quaran are absolutely disgusting. We should not disrespect anyone's religion, especially in such a horrible way.
Mandy says
I came over from BlogFrog, by the way
Emily Joyce says
Clarification on my comment above: I was quoting a book that quoted Rob Bell. I honestly hadn't heard of him before, and Honormommy has rightly brought it to my attention that he has some funky ideas…So please take the quote for what it's worth, but this is not an endorsement or agreement with all of Rob Bell's teachings 🙂
Sabrina says
Thanks, Emily! I think a lot of Christians or people who are just calling themselves Christians have been poorly reflecting Christ in this. I have also heard, that the imam of this mosque said that if he would have known it would have caused so much trouble, he would have picked another spot, but now that they have come this far, it seems that they have to stick to their decision and show people that we can all live in some sort of peace (very rough quote from my memory). Miss you!
Steph says
Religious freedom and cheek turning aside…building a mosque on (or next to) Ground Zero would be like hanging a swastika at a holocaust memorial.
Fairfield House says
>>"Go read the Constitution, and tell me if it says only Christians are allowed to build houses of worship where they want to. I thought it said Americans were allowed to build houses of worship where they wanted to."
Actually, the Constitution is silent on religion (including zoning regulations) except to state that there can be no state establishment of one.
No one is saying the ground zero mosque _can't_ be built, but many (myself included) are saying it ought not be built.
No, not all muslims are terrorists, but enough are to warrant a gimlet eye towards what seems a triumphalist political statement rather than a house of worship.
We are not at war with a terrorism because that is simply a tactic employed by a radical fascistic ideology that mixes religion and politics. To ignore the fanatical religious nature of such a movement is simply whistling past the graveyard; in this case the graveyard of thousands of fine Americans.
Emily Joyce says
You're absolutely right-the Constitution itself doesn't say anything about religion, it's the AMENDMENTS to it known as the Bill of Rights that does. I probably shouldn't be lumping those together. Thanks for pointing that out!